20Jun/11Off

Webe Web Corporation Sentencing

June 20th, 2011

We’ve followed the story of the Webe Web Corporation briefly here at Little Girl Heaven. Several months ago (February) it all reached a conclusion when the Webe Web photographer, Jeff Pierson the last of the three accused, was sentenced. It’s interesting browsing through the Government Sentencing Memorandum, I’ve compiled some notes below.

Here’s a breakdown of who was sentenced to what:
Jeffrey Robert Libman – Sentenced to 108 months (9 years) imprisonment followed by supervised release for the remainer of his natural life, Libman was also ordered to pay $1,600.00 in special assessments, and agreed to forfeit all criminal proceeds to pay restitution.
Marc Evan Greenberg – Sentenced to 33 months (approximately 3 years) imprisonment followed by 3 years of supervised release. Greenberg agreed to forfeit all criminal proceeds to pay restitution.
Jeff Pierson – Sentenced to 67 months (approximately 6 years) imprisonment to be followed by 10 years of supervised release.

Here’s how the Government justified the sentence issued to Jeffrey Robert Libman:

“Libman received a 108 month sentence as a result of having a different advisory guideline range and no 5K consideration. In addition Libman downloaded nude images of child pornography on his personal computer and actually traveled to Alabama to meet in-person with the defendant.”

Regarding Marc Evan Greenberg’s sentence:

“Greenberg managed the financial accounts of the corporation and exhibited some effort to comply with federal child pornography laws by retaining the advice of legal counsel. Furthermore, Greenberg apparently never had any personal contact with any of the children or took pictures of the of the children, unlike the defendant and co-conspirator Libman.”

Regarding Jeff Pierson’s sentence:

“The defendant does not have any prior criminal history, and emails between the co-conspirators expressed an interest in trying to conform to child pornography laws. However, the defendant’s pictures violate child pornography laws and the defendant and co-conspirators have stipulated to the illegality of some of the images. A sentence of 67 months followed by 10 years of supervised release sends a strong message of deterrence to anyone engaged in child modeling to be sure that none of their images cross the line set by federal child pornography laws.”

Below are some excerpts from Jeff Pierson’s response to the Government Sentencing Memorandum:

“The Government also informed the Court that Mr. Pierson photographed 16 minors. Although Jeff Pierson has maintained all along that each parent knew of the images, were present for the shootings or had access to them, several have sued Webe Web, Libman, Greenberg, Jeff and Anita Pierson, as well as certain credit card companies.
Six have requested restitution. Six did not (some victims vehemently did not want restitution). Three others have not responded to repeated attempts by the Government requesting them to address restitution issues. Lawyers appears for several of the victims and asked for $150,000.00 each”

“The Government has asserted that Jeff Pierson has provided substantial assistance leading to the dispositions, including the forfeitures and restitutions as set out above. In addition, Mr. Pierson asserts and represents to counsel that his cooperation led to the closing down of numerous (he claims over a 100) other similar sites”

And here’s a final note regarding the Webe Web case, taken from the FBI’s website:

“Greenberg and Webe Web admitted that the websites pertaining to 16 different children contained illegal images of child pornography. In some of the photos, the victims, all girls aged 8 to 15, were wearing underwear, lingerie, bathing suits, and other revealing outfits, and were posed in positions that constituted child pornography.”

29Oct/10Off

Everyone loves Miss Alli!

October 29th, 2010

Child Model: Miss Alli

You love Miss Alli!


I love Miss Alli!


Everyone loves Miss Alli!

No matter which forum you frequent, the chances are that whenever Miss Alli is mentioned there’s at least a handful of dedicated Alli fans among the Member List, and those that are seeing her for their first time, fall in love at first sight. Miss Alli is a model with a bright future in front of her, and many speculate that she’s the next Sandra.

We were able to get hold of Miss Alli’s photographer, Rebel Shooter to ask him some questions about Alli’s success, Miss Alli… and other stuff:

Your model, Miss Alli, is very popular both here on Little Girl Heaven and on other modeling forums (or at least the ones which I frequent). It seems almost that everyone who sees her, finds themselves instantly attracted. How did you come to find such a fine model, was she hand picked and recruited or was it more down to chance than anything?

I’ve said it many times, “There is only one “Miss Alli”. While most of the models I work with show a high level of confidence in themselves, none surpass the self confidence of Miss Alli. And, like all of the models I work with, Miss Alli was referred to me. I don’t recruit.

When you initially brought Miss Alli on as a model, did you ever expect that she would be so popular or gaining in popularity so fast as she is today?

One never knows how one will do until after the first few shoots are shot. When I met Miss Alli, she was 4 years old (turning 5 a month later). I had been postponing meeting her and her mom for the previous 6 months, because at the time, my policy was that I wouldn’t work with anybody new who was under the age of 8. After that first day, that policy was changed.

I have to ask, because I’m sure everyone else is curious too: What’s Alli like in real life to shoot with? What kind of girl is she?

Miss Alli is exactly how she portrays herself in her pictures. As some might already know, we don’t tell the models what to do or how to model. We let the models do the modeling. Miss Alli is also a very polite and decent person who is a straight “A” student in school. She is very smart.

On your agency website, Reb’s Fine Art Galleries, Alli fans are able to submit new items of clothing that Alli may potentially wear during a photo shoot, is it still possible to do this? And if so, what would be the weirdest item of clothing you’ve received to date?

We haven’t got anything too crazy. Here’s the website page.

http://www.rebelscsm.net/SponsorPage.html

In a lot of agencies, the models do one intense period of photo shoots over a handful of days, in which time they’ll accumulate enough material to keep their website going for an entire year. When you’re shooting with Alli, do you do it fairly regularly so that you can incorporate items/locations submitted by fans or in a similar fashion to that described above?

We shoot monthly.

Internet piracy has done a lot of damage to the child modeling industry, more so in recent years, sadly it’s the models which suffer the most in these situations. Given Alli’s popularity, do perceive internet piracy to be a major problem to your agency? And if so, what would be your message to people which do illegally share and download photos of models like Miss Alli?

Unlike other agencies, our models do not get paid until $$ comes in. There is no upfront money to the talent. They are all on commission. When galleries are pirated, it takes money away from the models. It is stealing and exploitive by definition. Fortunately, we have a solid encryption method, and we can cut off those who do it. Our die hard fans send us emails when new galleries pop up. We have great fans!!!!

For those that don’t know, a little bit of background is in order: Reb Shooter was originally contracted as a photographer for the no-longer active, Child Web Models, until a dispute arose over payment (or lack of) which ended with Reb Shooter going his own way with his models and forming his own agency, Reb’s Fine Art Galleries. With the benefit of hindsight, had there been no financial issues, how do you think you would feel about the split, do you think it was for the better?

I worked with Webe Web, CNS, CWM, and Agency Models. I did this because I never wanted to be involved in the website side of the biz. I was forced to make a site due to the lack of trust that evolved over the previous few years. CWM eventually paid us in full. Currently, we are still waiting for Agency to do the same.

I’m not sure whether you’re aware, but I read that Dale Russell, who used to run Child Web Models and had fled down to Mexico around the time of the split; Was arrested late last year and sentenced to 38 years in prison earlier this year. Despite the fallout which you had with Child Web Models, from what I understand Dale and yourself shared a fairly good friendship, is there any comments you’d like to make about this?

I don’t believe anything I read on the internet. (Even stuff that seems to be “Official”) I believe that Dale and I shared similar views on the first amendment and I know first hand that he didn’t have a very good attorney.

We’d like to thank Rebel Shooter for taking the time to share some of his insight with us.

3Oct/10Off

Magazines and Videos of Naked Preteens for Sale in Bangkok Street Stalls

October 3rd, 2010

Interesting the cultural differences. Could you ever imagine what would happen in our society if someone tried to sell child porn videos and magazines of naked little girls having sex, next to the latest Hollywood blockbuster?

After receiving several complaints about the DVD and VCD vendors along Sukhumvit Road between Soi 3 and 21, the Bangkok Post Sunday discovered that child pornography was openly displayed on tables along with copies of the latest Hollywood blockbusters.

The child pornography, sold on VCDs for 80 baht a disc, featured children from Burma, China, Europe, the Philippines and Thailand. Some of the VCD covers, which graphically showed children in sex acts, advertised that the children were as young as seven years old. Pornographic videos of bestiality were also displayed by vendors.

Several diplomats who live in the area expressed dismay when told of the open sales and after being shown the explicit covers of the VCDs.

”This is totally outrageous and should not be tolerated by the authorities,” said one ambassador who lives in the area. ”You would have to look hard for any country in the world where this would be allowed, let alone on the main tourist street of the capital.”

One resident who alerted the Bangkok Post Sunday to the VCDs said he was horrified that police were not cracking down on the vendors. ”They were being openly sold on roadside stalls at about 3pm on a Sunday afternoon. I couldn’t believe it.”

The open display of pornography would have been unthinkable only a few years ago, although pirated Hollywood movies were freely available.

Often the sellers of the Hollywood movies only display the covers, and get an assistant to retrieve the actual discs to minimise the chances of arrest.

A senior police officer who works on copyright infringement said local police and other enforcement agencies can confiscate obscene materials based only on the displayed cover.

”To distribute or exhibit obscene materials is a criminal offence under Section 287 of the penal code of Thailand with the punishment not exceeding three years’ imprisonment or fine not exceeding 6,000baht, or both,” said the officer, who asked to remain anonymous.

”It is a quite easy case; you don’t have to do much investigation because it is there on display. The policeman or any other authorised person can just take it from the stall and arrest the vendor. That’s all. But someone has to go there and do it. This is the problem.”

He added that the pirated pornographic video trade is run by ”influential people” so there was only a remote chance it would ever be stopped. ”It is like a certain casino on Phetchaburi Road _ not far away from Pantip Plaza _ which is open 24 hours a day, seven days a week. No one raids the building. The people who work there and run the place are untouchable,” the officer said.

Last Thursday, the Bangkok Post Sunday team counted 17 stalls between Soi 3 and 21 selling pirated movies, with nine displaying pornography. There were 18 other stalls selling sex aids and erectile dysfunction drugs, eight of which were also offering a variety of sex toys.

Despite the open display of pornography on Sukhumvit Road, there is virtually none on Silom Road.

”This might indicate different police districts,” said the officer. ”Silom Road is under the jurisdiction of Bangrak police station and has a different set of rules from the Lumpini station, which has jurisdiction over Sukhumvit Road.”

30Sep/10Off

Canadian Retailer Sorry for Selling Playboy Thongs to ‘Junior Girls’

September 30th, 2010

An advertisement for Playboy thongs aimed at preteens

It’s difficult to understand what people find so offensive about a popular culture icon like the Playboy bunny logo being printed on underwear for preteen girls. So much so that the retailer which advertised the undergarments apologized and Playboy tried to make out that they would have never intended their clothing would be worn by anyone under the age of 18:

One of Canada’s largest discount retailers is apologizing to customers who were offended by a back-to-school flyer advertising Playboy-branded junior girls’ thongs for sale.

Giant Tiger says it was a mistake for the Playboy-branded clothing to be advertised under the “back-to-school” banner and a second mistake to label them as “junior” wear.

The company, which has stores across Canada, says the Playboy attire was aimed at women, not girls, and while it won’t be in future flyers, it will still be sold at Giant Tiger stores.

Giant Tiger says it received complaints from about 30 parents who were offended by the flyer, and wrote each of them to apologize.

Playboy headquarters in Chicago says the company never markets anything to people under the age of 18 and would never advertise its products under a back-to-school banner.

A spokeswoman for Playboy says, if anything, their products would be marketed under a “back-to-campus” banner to make it clear it was aimed at customers over 18.

The question everyone avoids, is what’s so “offensive” about it to begin with?

9Sep/10Off

A New Breed of Child Modeling Agency Required

September 9th, 2010
VladModels

The logo of Russian VladModels

It’s become apparent that current business model that most child modeling websites follow to market their material, is becoming increasingly unpopular in the current climate of ‘pedohysteria.’ Where it would be potentially life-ruining or very damaging to ones reputation for their name to be discovered as a subscriber to an agency like LS Models or VladModels or any other agency which specializes in preteen models.

Sovereign Synthesis administrator, Sovvie echos the communities concerns:

It’s also fear of prison which has led many people to stick with file sharing rather than sign up to CM paysites. The latter tends to require submission of personal information. Such identifying info could easily end up in the hands of the police following a subpoena or raid.

Acknowledging this concern, it begs the question: how can child modeling agencies adapt to better suit the needs of their customers? Because it seems that if they refuse to make changes then we’ll see the trend of child modeling websites disappearing continue.

8Sep/10Off

Isn’t it Ironic?

September 8th, 2010

Swedish police have raided the controversial website host, PRQ:

The Swedish police had raided the premises of the host PRQ of Sweden in Solna in Sweden. This “host activist, who advocates a radical conception of freedom of expression, including the servers hosting the download site The Pirate Bay or sites advocating pedophilia.

The irony in this is that internet piracy has wreaked mega-damage on the child modeling industry, this especially true in recent years with the rise in popularity of file-sharing websites like the Pirate Bay. Arguably file sharing websites have probably done more to damage the child modeling agencies than law enforcement officials have ever been able to achieve.

1Sep/10Off

When child sex is not “Rape”

September 1st, 2010

Girl, eight, says 10-year-old boys did not rape her

This shocking story is proof positive that adults are passing their hysterical notions onto their children:

An eight-year-old girl alleged to have been sexually assaulted by two 10-year-olds told the Old Bailey today that the boys did not rape her.

She said she had lied to her mother because she had been “naughty” and was worried she would not get any sweets.

The girl was giving evidence over two days on a video screen. In a series of questions, she was asked if any parts of her body had been penetrated by the boys. She replied each time: “No.”

Later, she maintained that touching had taken place but the judge brought her ordeal to an end after saying she was exhausted. Mr Justice Saunders told her: “No one is suggesting you have done anything wrong – and I am the judge.”

The prosecution allege the boys took the girl to the third floor of a block of flats in Hayes, west London, then a nearby bin shed and into some bushes in order to find a “sufficiently secluded spot”, before assaulting her in October last year.

The pair, now 11 and 10, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, deny two charges each of rape and two charges each of attempted rape of a child under 13.

In cross-examination by defence counsel, the girl admitted that she had voluntarily been playing with the boys. She had pulled her own underwear down while the boys exposed themselves to her. Linda Strudwick, defending the older boy, asked her: “Did you ever tell your mum it was not you but it was [the boys] who took your knickers down? You didn’t want your mum to think you had been naughty?”

The girl replied: “Yeah.”

The judge asked what the girl had been worried about and she replied: “No sweets if it [sic] found out I had been naughty.”

31Aug/10Off

Pre-teen girls scantily clothed, modeling or child pornography?

August 31st, 2010

Miley Cyrus in Vanity Fair

Apparently members of a Florida community are up in arms over the photographs on David Hardman’s website.


According to a Tampa newspaper:

Is a website featuring pre-teen girls scantily clothed, modeling or pornography?

A central Florida man is under fire for running a website that features pre-teen girls (models) who are photographed while scantily clothed. The public is growing more incensed and allegations of child pornography are hurled at photographer, David Hardman. What type of clothing are the pre teen models wearing, you ask? We’re talking about young girls between the age of 10-17 years old wearing thong underwear and lingerie posing in bathtubs or lying on beds.

The parents of these girls sign a consent form, agreeing for their children to be photographed. They are also paid $500.00 for the shoot.


Are these pictures any different than the Annie Liebovitz photos of a topless Miley Cyrus? Hardly… and yet the hysteria continues.

25Aug/10Off

Back Online!

August 25th, 2010

We are back online after adding some excellent upgrades and security functions.

If you are already a member you will need to RESET YOUR PASSWORD.

If you have any issues getting online, feel free to email us at ligiheaven(at)gmail.com.

Welcome to the new and improved LGH Forums!

If you are not a member, please feel free to sign up. We are a safe and secure place to discuss your feelings about attractions to little girls.

21Aug/10Off

The Little Girl Heaven Forums Down for Upgrade

August 21st, 2010

As some of you will be noticing, our forums are currently inaccessible at the moment as we’re in the process of upgrading. Rest assured that the forums will be accessible again within the next 24 hours (hopefully less, but you never know with these things).

When the forums do go live again, registered members will have to reset their password (it will ask you to do this after you’ve tried signing in).

If you encounter any issues, leave a comment here with an e-mail address (we’ll ensure it’s not published) and we’ll get back to you. :)